In this review Mr Whybrow makes the most serious of charges against Mr Raven when he writes, “This exposes thoroughly the Unitarian character of reasoning involved …” (p. 14). Again, “If this is true, then the Unitarian character of the letter is evident …” (p. 43). Implied in these two extracts is that Mr Raven held a form of Unitarianism and thereby was rejecting the doctrines of the Trinity and deity of Christ.
Mr Mackintosh wrote regarding Mr Raven, “He may have been misunderstood and misrepresented.” It is not simply here a “may have been.” In this he certainly has.