Brethren Archive

The New Birth

by James Cornwell




Comments:
Tom said ...

Who was James Cornwell?

Which periodical does "The Ambassador" refer to?

Also do we know anything about "Crocker and Cooper" the publishers? Cooper I assume is "George Cooper", listed as a printer in Islington (e.g. on APC's pamphlets I recently uploaded). In the American Darby Letterboo, JND writes " I have sent to Mr. Crocker for publications in all .. ", is this the Mr Crocker of the partnership?

Saturday, Feb 8, 2020 : 21:40
Martin Arhelger said ...

Thank you for making this available, Tom!

As to Cornwell: On Mach 2nd 1870 G. V. Wigram wrote to JND: "Cornwell of Chelmsford works on steadily" (Letters of J.N. Darby, Supplement, Correspondence with G.V. Wigram, Volume 2, page 368). So it is perhaps the James Cornwell who was born 1830 in Kelvedon, Essex and died in Chelmsford 1876 - only 46 years old. Source: https://gw.geneanet.org/bcornwel?lang=en&iz=18&p=james&n=cornwell&oc=2

As to the Ambassador: The full title was: "The Ambassador; or, tidings of grace and truth to all classes". I have only one volume: 8 (1875). I haven't yet uploaded it to www.cw-archive.org . . I think Edwin Cross had a few volumes of this periodical.

Martin

Sunday, Feb 9, 2020 : 00:08
Tom said ...

Thanks Martin; this would indeed seem to be the correct attribution for J.C. - in the 1871 census he is listed as "Visitor of the sick & preacher of the Gospel". In his relatively short life it appears he had at least 2 wives and more than 10 children. On his death certifiate he is also listed as a "Preacher of the Gospel".

"The Ambassador's Hymn Book" https://www.brethrenarchive.org/hymnology/other-early-hymn-books/the-ambassadors-hymn-book/ (other copies also published by Crocker and Cooper), would look to be associated with this periodical too.

Edwin looks to have the Ambassador from 68,73,75,76 .. I will see if I can get hold of them.

Sunday, Feb 9, 2020 : 15:31
Martin Arhelger said ...

I have now uploaded "The Ambassador" 8: https://www.cw-archive.org/en/magazines/TA/8#1 Page 1 and the second page of the index are missing. Principal contributors to this volume are: REK, T, WB and GC. The last one is probably George Cooper, the Printer, himself. The others I couldn't identify. There is an article by J. G. Bellett (about the woman taken in adultery, Joh 8) which I could not find among JGB's known writings.

Martin

Sunday, Feb 9, 2020 : 22:23
ANDREW said ...
Under the entry for Walter Potter, there is an account of his migration to America from a meeting in England started by one JC - this page and other evidence shows he was referring to James Cornwell.
Friday, Jul 19, 2024 : 03:34
C Gribben said ...
Curious to see here the implication that new birth follows faith in Christ, rather than (as Darby argued) new birth preceding faith in Christ and making it possible.
Sunday, Jul 21, 2024 : 18:34
Syd said ...
C. Gribben, I think you are mistaken. I don’t believe that Darby taught that one “dead in trespasses and sins” must be regenerated or born again in order to then believe (by faith) unto salvation, if that is what you are suggesting.
Note: Regeneration is actually not exactly the same with the new birth, but there are those who believe that one is first regenerated (made alive), and then able to exercise faith.
Tuesday, Jul 23, 2024 : 02:07
C Gribben said ...
dear Syd, many thanks for your note. Here is how my thinking runs, and I'd be really grateful if you could make it more accurate:

Throughout his life, Darby assumed the standard Calvinist view that new birth preceded faith and repentance. [See, eg, Letters, 3: 121, 164-66; CW (old edition) 13:325, 15: 505; 20: 422; 33:80-81, 228-29.]

Other exclusives began to back away from these claims. Kelly denied that the new birth preceded saving faith in the first chapter of his Lectures on the doctrine of the Holy Spirit (1868), and wrote privately to deny that Darby had held this view. [Kelly insisted that the “argument about the new nature before believing is Calvinism, not Scripture”; CBA, Letters of William Kelly, Box 33, letter dated 6 December 1894; see also William Kelly, Lectures on the New Testament doctrine of the Holy Spirit (London: Morrish, n.d.), pp. 1-26.]

But Darby’s view remained current among Darbyite exclusives, and was perpetuated by F.E. Raven, C.A. Coates, and, into the next generation, by M.W. Biggs. See, for example, M.W. Biggs, The presence and activity of the Holy Spirit (London: Morrish, 1925), pp. 40-46.

Happy to receive corrections!
Tuesday, Jul 23, 2024 : 22:07
Greg said ...
From what you say Crawford, Kelly must have either changed his mind or wavered. Here are some examples--

Bible Treasury 9:280 [1872]
Many assume that the moment a man is born again he receives the Holy Ghost. But this is to confound the new birth with the gift of the Spirit. It is untrue that every man receives the Holy Ghost at the moment of being born again. There is an essential difference between the two operations. When one is born again, he is awakened from the slumber of sin and cries to God in the consciousness of his guilt and ruin. From the grace of Christ he may have divine comfort, but God lets him taste of the bitterness of his own heart and ways. In the great majority of cases converted souls know what this is; and it is well that they should.
I do not deny that it is an imperfect state, a state very different from the just effect flowing from a full knowledge of the gospel. Such may look to Christ without knowing His work, or the good news of salvation.

Bible Treasury 20:332
I do not mean the new birth, but the gift of the Spirit. This gift is far more than being born anew. New birth or awakening is in order that one may have Christ’s redemption, even the remission of sins. The blood of Jesus Christ, God’s Son, cleanseth us from all sin. We are brought to God through Christ once suffering for sins, Just for unjust. When begotten by the word of truth, we look out of ourselves and find rest for our conscience in Christ’s work on the cross; and thereon we receive the Holy Spirit. First we are born of water and the Spirit, as we read in John 3:5; and when we have heard the word of truth, the gospel of our salvation, we are sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise; and not before (Eph.1:13).

An Exposition of the Acts of the Apostles
Acts 9
We must not confound, as popular preachers and teachers do, the reception of life and salvation. Life is always given immediately; not so salvation. Saul was quickened the moment he believed in the Lord Jesus. But this is quite distinct from what scripture calls ‘salvation’; and hence we see, in the state of Saul, during the intermediate three days, a plain testimony to this important difference.

And therein also is seen the practical importance of distinguishing the new birth of the Spirit from the gift of the Spirit, as we have repeatedly pointed out in expounding this Book.
Acts 10
The Spirit of God is thus careful to make known the godly life of Cornelius. He was already a converted man, though a Gentile. But he did not know salvation proclaimed in the gospel.
Acts 11
Again, let us remark how clearly this discourse of Peter distinguishes new birth from salvation. Cornelius was assuredly born of God before Peter visited him at Caesarea. Nevertheless Peter was to speak unto him words whereby he should be saved. It is a gross mistake to suppose that the salvation which he now found is not far beyond new birth. Present salvation is the first foundation privilege of the gospel. To be born again was always true from Abel downwards. But those who are merely born again do not enter Christian ground until they have received at least the first and most needful blessing, to which the accomplishment of Christ’s work entitles all who believe.

To be born again never did suffice. One must have, through faith of Christ as the gospel proclaims Him and His work, the Spirit given to one as a believer. Without known remission of sins one may be quickened, but there cannot be what scripture calls ‘salvation’, any more than the Spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba, Father. There may be conversion, a divinely given hatred of evil and love of good, God’s word prized, and prayer; there may be conscience toward God, yet a real but imperfect looking to Christ. But till one knows by faith of the gospel, that all is clear between the soul and God through the sacrifice of Christ, the Holy Spirit does not seal the person, when there is submission to the righteousness of God, He does: then the believer is actually made a member of the one body of Christ.

Wednesday, Jul 24, 2024 : 12:00
C Gribben said ...
Thanks, Greg: interesting.

I notice that Huebner, in The Sovereignty of God in the Salvation of Lost Men, sees new birth and the exercise of saving faith as being simultaneous. So we have a third option!

Wednesday, Jul 24, 2024 : 15:41
Theophilus said ...
From Kelly’s Introductory Lectures on First Peter: (which I take to be was 1870):
“It is an effectual work of God's Spirit from the very starting-point of the career of faith. Elect of course they were in God's mind from all eternity, but they are sanctified from the first moment that the Holy Ghost opens their eyes to the light of the truth in Christ. There is an awakening of conscience by the Spirit through the word (for I am not speaking now of anything natural, of moral desires or emotions of the heart). Wherever there is a real work of God's Spirit — not merely a testimony to the conscience but an arousing of it effectually before God — the sanctification of the Spirit is made good.”
Wednesday, Jul 24, 2024 : 16:27
Joshua said ...

FG Patterson also taught Quickening and exercise of Faith to be simultaneous and repentance following them. Here is a long excerpt from 1874 Words of Truth: New Series 1: 212-213

"…..The blessed Lord Jesus goes in divine grace into that place for sins, and was there made sin for us. As Man, God quickened Him, and raised Him up, and set Him at His own right hand in the heavenlies (Eph. 1). THEN GOD PUTS FORTH THE SAME POWER—AND BESTOWS FAITH (THE GIFT OF GOD, CH. 2:8) ON INDIVIDUALS—QUICKENING DEAD SOULS, and appropriates in divine grace what Christ passed through to the individual, who is thus co-quickened and co-raised with Christ, and co-seated in Christ Jesus in heavenly places……

As to when a person is sealed-on conversion, or afterward? DOES A SOUL BELIEVE BEFORE HE IS QUICKENED? DOES BELIEVING, QUICKENING, AND CONVERSION ALL TAKE PLACE AT THE SAME MOMENT OF TIME, AND THEN AT SOME FUTURE PERIOD SEALING TAKES PLACE? A few words will suffice, I think. The sealing of the Spirit takes place, generally speaking, when the person has believed in Christ for remission of sins. QUICKENING TAKES PLACE IN THE ACTION OF THE HOLY GHOST, THROUGH THE WORD OF GOD, OR THE TRUTHS REVEALED THEREIN ON THE DEAD SOUL. THIS ACTION PRODUCES AND IMPARTS FAITH, WHICH IS SIMULTANEOUS WITH THE QUICKENING. A soul believes in what has been directly revealed, though forgiveness and salvation may not be known for long after. The new life thus imparted, being in action, finds the incongruity of the evil within. It begins to find its sins, as measured before God, a burden it cannot bear; even when forgiveness of these sins is known, it finds an evil nature over which it has no power, and this leads to the exercises of Rom. 7 till deliverance is known. In fact the sinner requires two things for peace: forgiveness for what it has done, and deliverance from what it is. When it learns to look out of self at Christ for forgiveness, the sealing of the Spirit takes place. And at times there may be the experiences of Rom. 7 in a modified way, when forgiveness is known, and the Holy Ghost there. Still, to take up Rom. 7, pure and simple, it does not suppose that the Holy Ghost has been received; it is an abstract case that is assumed. Generally speaking, however, the Holy Ghost is given as a seal, when Christ is rested upon for remission of sins; this is never the case at the moment, when the soul is born again.

“I find in the case of the younger son, in the parable (Luke 15), a happy illustration of the various divine actions of God with a soul.” When he “came to himself” he was quickened, and faith was in exercise. This produced a judgment of his state before God, and, as measured by His goodness, when he said, “I perish with hunger.” This was repentance-the action of the new life. Then came conversion, in, “I will arise and go to my father.” Conversion means simply that the heart is turned towards God, which had been turned away, from two Latin words, which signify to turn towards. Hence a man may be converted, according to its simple literal meaning, more than once; as Peter, to whom the Lord said, “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren,” i.e., when his heart was turned back again after his fall. But while one could be thus converted more than once—the heart turned back to God when turned away (How blessed that it is so!), one can only be once born again, or born of God, and this never can be undone or redone. Thus, when the prodigal was on his journey to meet his father, all the exercises of his soul present those passed through by the soul before sealing takes place. The father’s kiss would typify the time, probably, when sealing took place. "

Thursday, Jul 25, 2024 : 01:38
Syd said ...

Thanks all for this; perhaps we got away from Darby’s position. Mind you, Patterson learned much from Darby, judging from his many questions in letters to Darby. I think that Darby would have been much in agreement with Patterson here on the new birth.

On the new birth and the gift of the Holy Spirit—they’re not the same thing, as in W. Kelly’s comments above— I don’t think there is one of the early brethren who would disagree; also with regard to the sealing of the Spirit, after believing (Eph 1:13).

The observation that initiated this interesting discussion, was the distinction between “new birth follows faith in Christ,” and as Darby argued, “new birth preceding faith in Christ and making it possible.” And then C Gribben raised a third option of, “the new birth and the exercise of saving faith as being simultaneous.” I suppose that we need to agree on what the “new birth” is, and the faith involved.

I believe that one key to understanding Darby, Patterson, et al, on the new birth is this—FAITH, as in Eph 2:8, is a gift of God, which they and most of the early brethren, asserted. This has nothing to do with being Calvinist. Thus, being dead in sins and then quickened (made alive) (Eph 2:5), may be interpreted as being “born again,” and this preceding faith according to some. But this in a way separates the new birth from faith, and Scripture never does that. If so, where?

If the new birth is a divine action that involves all that is mentioned in the commentaries above—hearing the gospel; the awakening of the conscience; the opening of eyes to the light of the truth; the conviction of guilt and sin against a holy God; conversion - turning towards God; the need of repentance; and believing—is it at all feasible that this can happen without attendant faith; faith which is a gift of God? “A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven. (John 3:27). And is it not that faith cometh by the hearing of the word of God?

And when we ask how and when all this happens in a soul, once dead in sins, we should remember—The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. (John 3:8).

I say, preach the true, unadulterated gospel. Because salvation is of God, He by the Spirit and the Word will do the work without the help of man. We will see the results in a soul truly born again. For some new creatures in Christ, they still need to know and experience deliverance from the flesh (Rom 8).

Thursday, Jul 25, 2024 : 21:12
Steve H said ...
Surely birth - either physical or spiritual - is a process,

Obviously there is a particular point in time when the new born baby takes the first breath, but that is only the beginning and the subsequent development of each child is different.

I must have been present at my birth, but don't remember anything about it, so I only know which day of the week and at what hour it took place, because of what I have been told.

I was present at the birth of our children, and we now have nine grandchildren - all very different. We spent most of yesterday afternoon with four of them, and witnessed many different things each one likes to do.

Sadly, some Christian groups have attempted to make uniformity an important goal, rather than encouraging the diverse gifts, interests and talents of each individual.

Just as we have no memory of our physical birth, I am sure many also cannot pinpoint a particular date and time the spiritual (new) birth took place, and even for those who are able to do so, it is only the start of the new life, which is a wonderful adventure / journey, which continues until He comes or calls.

As we read our Bibles, and seek guidance, I am sure we will all receive many blessings, some of which we may well have the opportunity to share with others and encourage them in their personal journey with the Lord.

Steve H




Friday, Jul 26, 2024 : 06:35
Theophilus said ...
“The more we examine the Word of God, the more we are led to see and understand that new birth is the sovereign act of God in the history of a soul, sovereign as the wind which comes we know not whence, and goes we know not whither. Some sovereign communication from God is applied by the Holy Ghost in sovereign power, and the subject finds himself possessed of new-born interest he knows not how nor why.”
– W H WESTCOTT
Sunday, Sep 8, 2024 : 18:58


Add Comment: